Moorix Science · No. 01
The Physics of
Silence & Sound.
Why the sound your blood makes has defined blood pressure for 120 years — and how a machine finally learned to hear it.
01
The Sound Your Blood Makes
Place a stethoscope over the artery of an arm with a cuff inflated above systolic pressure, and you hear nothing. The artery is squeezed shut. Now let the cuff deflate slowly. At a precise pressure, a faint, rhythmic tapping appears — blood forcing its way back through a partially closed vessel, turbulence striking the arterial walls.
That tapping is the Korotkoff sound. Each occurrence is brief — roughly 20 to 60 milliseconds — with a fundamental frequency between 16 and 50 Hz. Almost all of its acoustic energy sits between 20 and 300 Hz: the band where human hearing is least sensitive. The most important sound in cardiovascular medicine is, by design, nearly inaudible.
02
Five Phases, Two Numbers
In 1905, the Russian physician Nikolai Korotkoff described five phases in these sounds as the cuff deflates. They map directly onto the two numbers every blood-pressure reading is made of:
K1 — the first tapping: systolic pressure, the moment blood re-enters the arm. K2 — a turbulent murmur. K3 — the sound turns crisp and louder. K4 — it muffles. K5 — the sound disappears altogether: diastolic pressure, the artery finally resting open.
The fifth phase is the decisive one. International practice records diastolic pressure at the disappearance of the sound — and disappearance, unlike appearance, has no crisp edge. It fades.
03
Why the Clinic Never Left It
Electronic monitors have existed since the 1970s. Yet every major validation standard — AAMI, ESH, and today's ISO 81060-2 — still defines accuracy by comparison against a human listener with a stethoscope and a mercury column.
That is not nostalgia. It is because the listener is the reference: the ear hearing the Korotkoff sound is what "true" blood pressure means in these protocols. The clinic never left the method, because nothing else had earned its place.
AAMI · ESH · ISO 81060-2 reference method
04
The Ear That Couldn’t Be Copied
If a trained ear is the reference, why not simply record what it hears and let software decide? Three obstacles stood in the way for a century.
Loudness is perceptual. A microphone measures pressure; a listener judges loudness. Between 20 and 300 Hz, perceived loudness falls far below measured energy — and changes with frequency. A machine that amplifies the signal without modelling the ear will chase energy the ear never hears, and miss sounds the ear never misses.
The room is not silent. Clothing rustles, cuffs creak, a hand shifts. The listening must be weighted toward what matters and away from what does not — the same problem broadcast engineers solved with perceptual loudness standards.
The tail submerges. The final Korotkoff sounds do not stop; they sink into the pulse itself. There is no threshold below which the sound is "gone" — only a judgement, made the way a trained listener makes it.
05
How We Taught a Machine to Listen
Beat 1 does not hand the problem to software and hope. Its signal chain is analog-first: the sound is conditioned, filtered and shaped into its envelope entirely in hardware, before the processor sees anything. The processor’s only job is the final determination — by transparent, published rules.
Sense
MEMS microphone + cuff pressure sensor
Synchronised to the millisecond
Condition
Preamp + band-pass 20–300 Hz
Analog domain, zero latency
Shape
Rectify → envelope integrate
RC network forms the sound’s contour
Characterise
Higher-order derivative features
Onset, crest, decay of each phase
Determine
Rule-based phase judgement
Transparent — no black box
Low power · no cloud · no hidden model — the listening is honest by construction
The decisive module is the one at the end: tail-phase detection. Where earlier attempts waited for an absolute quiet that never cleanly arrives, Beat 1 evaluates the distribution of residual sound energy across the tail of the measurement — separating a true disappearance of the Korotkoff sound from a sound that merely went quiet. It is the machine's equivalent of a trained ear deciding there: that is where the artery opened.
06
How It Will Be Proven
An honest claim about the gold standard must be tested the way the gold standard is tested. Beat 1 is undergoing a validation programme per ISO 81060-2, measured side-by-side against mercury sphygmomanometry with trained observers.
The acceptance criteria are the clinical ones: a mean difference within ±3 mmHg and a standard deviation within ±5 mmHg, across low, normal and high pressure ranges. The programme is in progress. We will publish the outcome when it concludes.
Validation programme in progress · data pending
07
Three Ways to Measure
Every blood-pressure technology belongs to one of three families. They are not competitors on a spec sheet — they are different answers to a different question: estimate, listen, or both.
| Oscillometric | Clinical Auscultation | Electronic Korotkoff | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Principle | Estimates from pressure waves | A trained ear hears the Korotkoff sound | The determination logic of the clinic, in electronics |
| Judgement | Fitted algorithm — a model of a population | The listener’s experience and alertness | Transparent rules — objective, repeatable |
| Compute | Modest | A human | A microcontroller — no cloud, no black box |
| Record | A number only | None | The measurement recorded, and playable back |
| Place | The home | The clinic | The reference method, at home |
Categories, not brands. Oscillometric monitors remain a reliable estimation technology; Beat 1 exists because estimation and hearing are not the same thing.
08
Questions, Answered Plainly
Is my current monitor wrong? Open +
No. Oscillometric monitors are a dependable estimation technology, and for most people most of the time they serve well. Beat 1 exists because estimation and hearing are not the same thing — it returns the determination logic of the clinical reference to the home, for those who want it.
Can I diagnose myself with the playback feature? Open +
No. Playback replays the sounds recorded during your measurement — it is a record, not a diagnostic instrument. If a reading concerns you, take it to a clinician.
Do my readings leave the device? Open +
Not unless you choose to sync. Beat 1 determines everything on-device: no cloud model, no hidden processing. Privacy is the default, not a setting you have to find.
Why has this taken 120 years? Open +
Because the hard part is not hearing the sound — it is knowing when it has ended. The tail of the Korotkoff sequence submerges into the pulse, and judging that silence perceptually, in electronics, at low cost, is what had never been solved. That is the problem we spent three years on.
When can I have one? Open +
Beat 1 is completing its ISO 81060-2 validation programme. Join the waitlist and we will write when it is ready — nothing more, nothing sooner.
Hear What Your Monitor Has Been Missing.
Join the Beat 1 Waitlist.
Join the Waitlist ← Back to Moorix